A federal firearms charge is not a bigger version of a state gun case. It runs on different rules, different agencies, and sentencing law that removes most of the discretion a state judge would otherwise have.

If ATF agents or FBI agents have contacted you, searched your home, or you’ve learned a grand jury is looking at your case, the decisions you make in the first days matter. We defend people charged with federal firearms offenses, and this page explains how these cases work, what you’re up against, and where a defense lawyer changes the outcome.

What Makes a Gun Charge Federal Instead of State

Most gun possession cases are prosecuted in state court. A charge becomes federal when it touches specific triggers written into federal law.

Interstate commerce. Nearly every federal firearms statute requires proof that the gun “traveled in or affected interstate commerce.” Because most firearms are manufactured out of state, this element is easy for prosecutors to satisfy — even for a gun that never left the state where it was found.

ATF or FBI involvement. When the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives or the FBI opens the investigation, rather than local police, the case is built for federal court from the start.

Federal property or federal offense overlap. Guns found on federal land, at airports, in the mail, or connected to another federal crime (bank robbery, drug trafficking, immigration offenses) typically stay in the federal system.

Multi-state trafficking or straw purchasing patterns. If the government believes guns moved across state lines to people who couldn’t lawfully buy them, that pattern draws federal attention because it involves interstate commerce and federally licensed dealers.

Drug-gun combinations. When agents find a firearm alongside drug trafficking evidence, federal prosecutors frequently add a firearms count under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), discussed below. In those situations, experienced federal drug crimes defense lawyers are often a critical part of the defense.This single addition can extend a sentence more than any other charge in the case.

Local police can also refer a case to federal prosecutors — sometimes because federal sentencing is harsher, sometimes because the state charge would be harder to prove. This is often called “adoption” of a case, and it can happen even after a state case has already started.

Common Federal Firearms Charges

Federal firearms law is built primarily around the Gun Control Act of 1968, later amended, and the National Firearms Act of 1934. Below are the charges we see most often.

Felon in Possession of a Firearm — 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)

This is the most frequently charged federal firearms offense. It applies when someone with a disqualifying record — a felony conviction, certain misdemeanor domestic violence convictions, an active restraining order, unlawful drug use, or a few other categories — possesses a firearm or ammunition that has any connection to interstate commerce.

The government does not need to prove you owned the gun. Constructive possession — meaning the gun was found somewhere you had access to and control over, like your car or bedroom — is enough for prosecutors to bring the charge. Knowledge that the firearm was present is a required element, and that knowledge element is frequently where these cases are won or lost.

Hypothetical: A person with a prior felony conviction is a passenger in a friend’s car. Police find a handgun under the passenger seat during a traffic stop. Whether that person “possessed” the firearm — knowingly and with the ability to control it — is a factual question a jury has to decide, not an automatic conclusion from proximity alone.

Straw Purchasing — 18 U.S.C. § 932 and § 922(a)(6)

A straw purchase happens when someone who can legally buy a firearm buys it on behalf of a person who cannot — often because that person is a prohibited felon, is under a protective order, or wants to avoid a background check under their own name. It also covers buying a gun for someone in another state to avoid that state’s laws.

Federal law criminalizes both the false statement made on the required purchase form (ATF Form 4473) and, since 2022, the act of straw purchasing itself as its own distinct federal offense under § 932. A straw purchase conviction is a felony and can carry a sentence of up to 15 years, longer if the firearm was used or intended for use in another crime, including drug trafficking or terrorism.

Possession of a Firearm During a Drug Trafficking Crime — 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)

This charge is added on top of an underlying drug or violent crime charge — it is never charged alone. It applies when a firearm is possessed “in furtherance of,” or used or carried “during and in relation to,” a drug trafficking offense or a crime of violence.

The defining feature of § 924(c) is that its mandatory minimum sentence must run consecutively — stacked on top of — the sentence for the underlying crime, not alongside it. The base mandatory minimum is 5 years. It rises to 10 years if the firearm is a short-barreled rifle, short-barreled shotgun, or a semiautomatic assault weapon, and to 30 years if the firearm is a machine gun, a destructive device, or equipped with a silencer.

National Firearms Act Violations

The National Firearms Act (NFA) regulates a specific category of weapons that Congress decided require federal registration: short-barreled rifles (barrel under 16 inches), short-barreled shotguns (barrel under 18 inches), suppressors/silencers, machine guns, and destructive devices. Possessing one of these items without proper registration in the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record is a federal offense, regardless of whether the underlying weapon would otherwise be legal to own.

NFA cases frequently arise from what looks like a technical mistake — an inherited firearm never transferred on paper, a homemade suppressor, or a rifle modified without realizing the barrel length created an NFA firearm. Violations under the NFA can carry up to 10 years in federal prison and substantial fines.

Comparing the Four Charge Types

Federal Firearms Charges · At a Glance
Four charges, four different exposure profiles. Know which one applies to your situation.
18 U.S.C. § 922(g)
Felon in Possession
Core question —
Did the person knowingly possess a firearm or ammunition despite a disqualifying status — felony conviction, domestic violence misdemeanor, restraining order, or unlawful drug use?
Up to 10 years
15-year min. if ACCA applies
Knowledge and access — not just proximity — are what prosecutors must prove
§ 932 / § 922(a)(6)
Straw Purchase
Core question —
Did someone buy a firearm on behalf of a prohibited person, or misrepresent the true buyer on ATF Form 4473? Both the false statement and the purchase itself are separately chargeable since 2022.
Up to 15 years
Longer if used in another crime
The buyer and the recipient can both face charges depending on the facts
NFA Violation
Unregistered NFA Firearm
Core question —
Was a regulated weapon — suppressor, short-barreled rifle or shotgun, machine gun, or destructive device — possessed without proper registration in the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record?
Up to 10 years and substantial fines
Frequently arises from inherited firearms, homemade suppressors, or unintentional barrel modifications

If you are unsure which category applies to your situation, contact our office to talk through what you’re facing before you speak with an agent or prosecutor again.

Federal Sentencing Exposure and Enhancement Concepts

Federal gun sentencing is shaped by statutory mandatory minimums and the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, and it does not include parole. A person convicted federally generally serves the large majority of the imposed sentence.

The Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA)

The Armed Career Criminal Act, codified at 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), applies to someone convicted of felon in possession who also has three prior convictions — on separate occasions — for a violent felony, a serious drug offense, or both. If ACCA applies, the standard 0–10-year range for felon in possession is replaced with a 15-year mandatory minimum, with a maximum of life.

According to U.S. Sentencing Commission data, the average sentence for felon-in-possession cases overall is measured in years, but average sentences for cases where ACCA applies run dramatically longer because the 15-year floor removes the judge’s ability to go lower. Whether a prior conviction actually qualifies as a “violent felony” or “serious drug offense” under ACCA’s specific legal definitions is frequently a contested, technical legal question — not something to assume based on how the prior offense was labeled at the time.

Stacking Under § 924(c)

When a defendant faces multiple § 924(c) counts in the same case, or has a prior § 924(c) conviction, the consecutive-sentence structure compounds. Each qualifying count adds its own mandatory consecutive term on top of the others.

Why the Guidelines Still Matter

Even where there’s no mandatory minimum, the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines calculate a recommended range using the type of firearm, the defendant’s criminal history, whether the firearm was stolen or had an altered serial number, and whether it was connected to another felony. Judges must calculate this range and consider it, even though it is advisory rather than mandatory after United States v. Booker.

Because so much of federal gun sentencing is formula-driven rather than left to a judge’s individual sense of the case, the legal work that happens before sentencing — challenging enhancements, disputing prior convictions, negotiating the charges themselves — carries enormous weight. This is where the background of your defense team matters. Russell Lorfing spent years as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Lubbock and trained federal agents and prosecutors for the FBI, IRS, DEA, and DOJ, which means he has seen these cases built from the government’s side of the table.

How a Federal Firearms Case Proceeds

Federal cases move through a more structured process than most state cases, and each stage creates decision points.

1. Investigation. ATF or FBI agents build the case before any arrest, often through informants, surveillance, database checks (like tracing a firearm’s sale history), or a referral from a state agency. You may not know you’re under investigation until agents show up or a subpoena arrives.

2. Grand jury and indictment. Federal felony charges generally require a grand jury indictment. Prosecutors present evidence to the grand jury without the defense present, and an indictment simply means the grand jury found enough evidence to proceed — it is not a finding of guilt.

3. Initial appearance and detention hearing. After arrest, you appear before a federal magistrate judge, who decides whether you’ll be held pending trial or released, often with conditions. Firearms charges, especially combined with a criminal record or a drug charge, make pretrial detention more likely, which raises the stakes of this hearing significantly.

4. Discovery and pretrial motions. Your defense team reviews the government’s evidence — search warrants, lab reports on the firearm, witness statements, ATF trace reports — and can challenge how evidence was obtained. A successful motion to suppress evidence from an unlawful search can end a case.

5. Plea negotiation or trial. Most federal cases resolve through negotiated pleas, but that decision should follow a real evaluation of the government’s evidence and legal defenses, not come by default. Some cases are worth taking to trial.

6. Sentencing. The court calculates the applicable Guidelines range, considers any mandatory minimums, and hears arguments from both sides before imposing sentence.

A defense lawyer’s work matters at every one of these stages — often most heavily at the investigation and pretrial stages, before charges are locked in or a plea is on the table. If you’re already at the indictment stage, reach out now so we can start reviewing the evidence against you.

Common Mistakes People Make When Contacted by ATF or FBI Agents

What you do in the first conversation with a federal agent often shapes the rest of the case.

  • Talking without a lawyer present. Agents are trained interviewers. A false statement to a federal agent — even about something unrelated to the gun itself — is its own separate federal crime under 18 U.S.C. § 1001.
  • Consenting to a search. You are not required to consent to a search of your home, car, or phone just because agents ask politely. Consent given under pressure is still consent.
  • Assuming a state case is over means the matter is closed. Federal prosecutors can bring their own charges even after a state case ends in an acquittal, dismissal, or a plea to a lesser offense. Federal and state governments are separate sovereigns for this purpose.
  • Trying to explain or minimize on your own. Explaining “it’s not really mine” or “I was holding it for someone” hands prosecutors an admission of knowledge and access — the exact element they need to prove possession.
  • Waiting to get a lawyer involved. Evidence, witness memory, and cooperation opportunities are strongest early. Waiting until after an indictment narrows your options.
  • Destroying evidence or getting rid of the firearm. Deleting text messages, wiping a phone, or trying to make a gun disappear does not make the underlying problem go away. It creates a new one: obstruction of justice. Obstruction can actually be easier for the government to prove than the original firearms charge, because prosecutors can show what existed, what disappeared, and exactly when it happened.
  • Hoping the problem goes away on its own. While you wait and hope, investigators are not waiting. They are pulling records, tracing the firearm’s sale history, and talking to witnesses. By the time an investigation feels real to you, it is often much further along than you think.

If agents have already contacted you or executed a search, the most useful thing you can do next is stop talking and call a federal defense lawyer before answering anything further.

What To Do If You Believe You’re Already Under Investigation

You do not need to wait for an arrest, a search, or an indictment to start protecting yourself. If you have reason to believe ATF, the FBI, or a federal grand jury is looking at you or someone close to you, a few principles hold true no matter the specific charge.

Hire experienced federal criminal defense counsel immediately. Do this before agents show up or a subpoena arrives, not after. A lawyer who regularly handles federal firearms cases can help you understand your actual exposure and how the government is likely to view the facts.

Preserve everything, and change nothing. Keep every message, document, and record connected to the situation exactly as it is. Do not delete, edit, or try to “clean up” anything, even if it seems unrelated or harmless.

Understand that investigations move quietly before they become visible. Agents build a case through records, firearm trace databases, and witness interviews long before a target knows an investigation exists. By the time it feels real to you, the government may already be well ahead, and reacting late means you are responding to decisions instead of making them.

Federal Gun Charges vs. State Gun Charges

People often assume “a gun charge is a gun charge.” The practical differences are significant. While this page explains federal firearms defense nationwide, our Houston Federal Gun & Weapons Defense Lawyer page breaks down how these cases are handled for people facing gun and weapons charges in the Houston area.

  • Sentencing structure: Federal sentencing relies heavily on mandatory minimums and Guidelines calculations; state sentencing generally gives judges more discretion.
  • Parole: There is no parole in the federal system. State systems often allow earlier release through parole or good-time credit that reduces actual time served more significantly.
  • Investigating agency: Federal cases are built by ATF or FBI, with more investigative resources, more time, and access to national databases like firearm trace records.
  • Venue and jury pool: Federal trials happen in federal district court, often before a jury drawn from a wider geographic area than a local county.
  • Case pace: Federal cases follow strict speedy trial timelines but also involve more formal discovery and motion practice.

Our firm has seen this distinction from both directions. Trey Keith secured a not-guilty verdict defending an Unlawful Possession of a Firearm by a Felon charge at the state level in the 350th District Court in Taylor County — a result that reflects the kind of jury-trial experience with firearm possession law that also applies when the same conduct is charged federally instead.

Federal vs. State · Key Differences
A gun charge is not a gun charge. Five differences that change everything about your defense.
State Gun Charges
What state court typically looks like for a firearms offense.
  • 01
    Sentencing
    Judges generally have more discretion; mandatory minimums exist but are less common and less extreme than ACCA or § 924(c). A sympathetic judge can go lower.
  • 02
    Parole & Release
    Most state systems allow parole or good-time credits that can reduce actual time served significantly — often by a third or more of the imposed sentence.
  • 03
    Investigation
    Local or state police — typically more limited database access and resources. Firearm trace history and national records are less central to the case.
  • 04
    Venue & Jury
    County court before a local jury drawn from the surrounding community — jurors often have more familiarity with local context and norms.
  • 05
    After Resolution
    A state acquittal, dismissal, or completed sentence addresses the state charge. It does not automatically close the door on a federal charge for the same conduct.
Federal Gun Charges
What changes when ATF or FBI brings the case to federal court.
  • 01
    Sentencing
    ACCA mandates a 15-year floor. § 924(c) adds 5 to 30 mandatory years — consecutive. The Sentencing Guidelines calculate the range. Judges have far less room to go lower.
  • 02
    No Parole
    There is no parole in the federal system. Federal prisoners generally serve at least 85% of the sentence imposed. The number the judge says is close to the number you serve.
  • 03
    Investigation
    ATF or FBI — with national firearm trace databases, more resources, and often months or years building a case before any arrest. By the time you know, the file is already deep.
  • 04
    Venue & Jury
    U.S. District Court before a jury drawn from a wider geographic federal district — formal discovery, strict speedy trial timelines, and federal rules of evidence apply throughout.
  • 05
    Separate Sovereign
    Federal and state governments are separate sovereigns. Federal prosecutors can charge the same conduct even after a state acquittal, dismissal, or completed sentence — double jeopardy does not prevent it.
Key point
A state acquittal or completed plea does not bar a federal charge for the same firearm or conduct. Federal and state governments are separate sovereigns — both can prosecute, and often do.

How We Approach a Federal Firearms Defense

Every federal gun case starts with the same question: what can the government actually prove, and how did they get it?

We review the search or seizure that led to the firearm being found, looking for constitutional problems with how it was obtained. We evaluate whether the “knowing possession” element genuinely holds up against the facts, rather than assuming it does because a gun was found nearby. We scrutinize whether ACCA or § 924(c) enhancements are legally supportable based on the specific prior convictions involved, not just how those convictions are labeled. And we prepare every case as though it could go to trial, because that preparation is often what produces a better negotiated resolution.

Russell Lorfing’s background as a former Assistant U.S. Attorney means he has built and evaluated federal cases from inside the U.S. Attorney’s Office, including training federal agents and prosecutors for the FBI, IRS, DEA, and DOJ. He currently serves as the 2024 Co-Chair of the Federal Criminal Defense Committee for the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association and is admitted to practice in Texas, the District of Columbia, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, the Northern, Western, and Southern Districts of Texas, and the United States Supreme Court. Of Counsel Hon. E. Scott Frost (Ret.) brings more than 30 years of federal courtroom experience to case strategy and sentencing preparation.

Beyond Russell and Trey, our broader team includes former federal prosecutors, former federal public defenders, former FBI agents, former IRS criminal investigators, and a retired federal judge. That range of backgrounds means we can look at a federal firearms case from the same angles the government uses to build one, because several of us have worked those angles ourselves.

Federal firearms law applies the same way regardless of where you live, and we defend federal gun and weapons charges nationwide. If you are under investigation or facing charges, schedule a consultation to discuss what you’re facing and what comes next.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do I know if my gun charge is federal or state?

Check who is prosecuting the case. If the case caption reads “United States v. [Name]” and it’s proceeding in U.S. District Court, it’s federal. If ATF or FBI agents conducted the investigation, or your charge cites a section of Title 18 of the U.S. Code, that’s also a strong sign the case is federal.

Yes. Federal and state governments are considered separate sovereigns, so a state acquittal, dismissal, or completed sentence does not automatically bar a federal charge over the same firearm or conduct.

Release before trial is possible but not guaranteed. A federal magistrate judge weighs flight risk and danger to the community, and firearms charges — particularly combined with a criminal history or a drug charge — make detention more likely. This is one of the earliest points where legal representation matters most.

A felony conviction, including a federal firearms felony, generally results in a lifetime federal prohibition on possessing firearms under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), absent a limited and difficult path to restoration. This is a serious, long-term consequence beyond the sentence itself.

Before you answer any questions beyond identifying yourself. Anything said afterward can be used to build the case against you, and early legal involvement often affects what charges are even filed.

No. Straightforward felon-in-possession charges under § 922(g) generally carry no mandatory minimum unless the Armed Career Criminal Act applies. Other charges, like § 924(c) drug-gun combinations, do carry mandatory minimums by statute.

Facing Federal Scrutiny?

Speak with our federal investigations team confidentially.

24/7 Crisis Line: 325-480-8100

Engagements nationwide

The Team

Former Federal Officials.
Strategic Crisis Counsel.

Russell Lorfing Headshot

Partner

Russell Lorfing Former Federal Prosecutor

  • Multi-award-winning trial lawyer and former federal prosecutor.
  • Has handled thousands of cases and lead counsel in numerous federal trials.
  • Served as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Northern District of
  • Texas and ran a human trafficking task force on Saipan.
  • Selected for the IRS’ Director’s Award for his prosecutorial accomplishments on financial investigations.
  • Recognized nationally for his work on white-collar investigations, bringing a wealth of experience to every case.

Read Bio

Brandi Young headshot

Partner

Brandi Young Former Federal Prosecutor

  • Retired from the Department of Justice as a career federal prosecutor before joining Keith & Lorfing.
  • Oversaw hundreds of federal investigations and served as lead counsel in over 30 federal jury trials.
  • Served as Supervisory Assistant United States Attorney in the Western District of Texas for nearly a decade.
  • Advises corporations and family offices on mitigation strategy and assists with internal compliance audits.

Read Bio

David Sloan headshot

Partner

David Sloan Former Federal Defender

He put his trial skills to work in the courtroom, prosecuting cases for Ellis County and the District Attorney’s office in Waxahachie. His skills were recognized by the trial lawyers around him, and he went from a misdemeanor prosecutor to lead counsel on murder trials in less than three years.

Read Bio

C Richard Baker headshot

Of Counsel

C. Richard Baker Former Assistant United States Attorney

Over five decades of courtroom and prosecutorial experience, including more than 30 years as an Assistant United States Attorney. A former U.S. Marine Corps officer and Vietnam veteran recognized for his trial experience in high-profile criminal matters. His command of federal criminal procedure gives clients a strategic advantage in grand jury proceedings and serious criminal exposure, with a particular passion for representing veterans.

Read Bio

Scott Frost headshot

Of Counsel

Hon. Scott Frost (Ret.) Former Federal Judge

Keith served as an FBI Special Agent in Lubbock for 27 years, focusing on human trafficking, crimes against children, and terrorism. Known for his collaborative leadership and relentless pursuit of justice, he now brings his expertise to our firm as Special Investigator.

Read Bio

Eric Gerard headshot

Of Counsel

Eric Gerard Former Federal Prosecutor

Keith served as an FBI Special Agent in Lubbock for 27 years, focusing on human trafficking, crimes against children, and terrorism. Known for his collaborative leadership and relentless pursuit of justice, he now brings his expertise to our firm as Special Investigator.

Read Bio

Chris Solid headshot

Of Counsel

Chris Solis Former Federal Prosecutor

Shane Chriesman headshot

Senior Associate

Shane Chriesman Former Federal Prosecutor

Javier Rocha headshot

Strategic Advisor

Javier Rocha Family Office Executive & Attorney

A family office executive and attorney with over a decade leading privately held businesses and executive teams across complex organizations. His career has focused on governance, investments, operations, and long-term stewardship for family office functions involving billions in assets, advising billion-dollar enterprises on internal investigations, investment diligence, and succession planning. Serves as Board of Directors Chairman for Heritage School and Assistant Scoutmaster for Troop 137.

Read Bio

Advisors & Investigators

Strategic Advisors & Federal Investigators

A bench of former federal agents, prosecutors, and senior advisors who provide investigative
depth and strategic counsel on the firm’s most complex matters.

Arthur Gonzales headshot

Strategic Investigator

Arthur Gonzales Former FBI Supervisory Special Agent

Nearly three decades with the FBI in leadership roles spanning counterterrorism, organized crime, and financial crimes. Recognized nationally and internationally for expertise in complex federal investigations, crisis management, and undercover operations, and served as an instructor at the FBI Academy. Provides strategic consulting and investigative support in federal criminal defense and white-collar investigations.

Read Bio

Michael Ornorff headshot

Strategic Investigator

Michael Orndorff Retired FBI Special Agent

Over two decades of federal investigative experience in terrorism, national security threats, and white-collar crime. Served as lead FBI Special Agent in the successful disruption of a terrorist plot involving Khalid Aldawsari, with deep expertise in sensitive investigations, complex evidence, and crisis response. Now advises on federal criminal defense, government investigations, and national security matters.

Read Bio

Travis Thorson headshot

Strategic Investigator

Travis Thorson Retired IRS-CI Special Agent & FBI Task Force Officer

Over two decades of federal investigative experience focused on complex financial crimes, money laundering, and organized criminal enterprises. A former IRS Special Agent whose forensic accounting work was critical in tracing illicit financial activity and building federal prosecutions. Provides strategic consulting for federal criminal defense, forensic accounting, and money laundering investigations.

Read Bio

Keith Quigley headshot

Special Investigator

Keith Quigley Former FBI Special Agent

Keith served as an FBI Special Agent in Lubbock for 27 years, focusing on human trafficking, crimes against children, and terrorism. Known for his collaborative leadership and relentless pursuit of justice, he now brings his expertise to our firm as Special Investigator.

Read Bio

Jennifer Sparks

Strategic Investigator

Jenifer Sparks Retired FBI Special Agent & Certified Profiler

Nearly three decades of FBI experience specializing in violent crime investigations, behavioral analysis, and crimes against children. Served as a Special Agent, Supervisory Special Agent Profiler, and Coordinator of the FBI’s Child Exploitation Task Force. Provides strategic consulting in federal criminal defense, human trafficking investigations, witness credibility assessment, and behavioral analysis.

Read Bio

Jennifer Cejpek headshot

Strategic Investigator

Jennifer Cejpek Former FBI Special Agent & Certified Fraud Examiner

More than two decades of federal investigative and intelligence experience specializing in healthcare fraud, financial crimes, and public corruption. As a former FBI Special Agent, she led complex federal investigations in close coordination with the Department of Justice. Background includes service as an Electronic Warfare and Intelligence Analyst in the U.S. Army and expertise in forensic interviewing. Advises on federal criminal defense, white-collar crime, and compliance matters.

Read Bio

William Luttrell headshot

Strategic Advisor

William Luttrell Financial Analyst & CPA

Financial analyst and Certified Public Accountant advising the firm on complex financial matters, forensic accounting, and the analysis of records central to federal white-collar and financial crime defense.

Read Bio

Recognition

Awards & Honors

Internal Revenue Service

IRS Director’s Award

For prosecutorial accomplishments on financial investigations

National Recognition

Multi-Award-Winning Trial Lawyers

Recognized nationally for white-collar investigations work

U.S. Department of Justice

Career Federal Prosecutors

Decades of distinguished service at the U.S. Department of Justice

Combined Team Experience

More Than 150 Years of Federal Law Enforcement Experience

Combined experience across DOJ, FBI, and the federal bench

Accolades & Accreditations

Client Reviews

What Our Clients Say

  • 5.0
  • Based on 361 verified Google reviews

I had a dear family friend retain Russell behind some very serious criminal charges. Russell listened and maintained contact through the whole process to assure he felt comfortable and in the loop. With Russell’s help, the case/investigation was dismissed and innocence ensured. We are so grateful for Russell’s dedication and professionalism. Would definitely recommend

  • Jaileen Ceballo
  • Google Review

Our personal experience could not have been better. These attorneys worked diligently and stayed in constant contact with us regarding the developments in our case. We always had the final say in any offers made by the prosecution. If I could only say one thing about them it would be “they listen” I always felt that my opinion was heard and considered. We discussed everything good and bad. When a decision was finally agreed on we felt it was the very best and truthfully an almost unbelievable outcome. I never want to find my family in the midst or subject of a criminal case ever again but if it happens my first and only call will be to this law firm. Big thanks to Russell and Chris on a job well done. And the office staff are simply amazing! Always polite, knowledgeable, and professional. Thank you all for treating us as family and working so hard to bring this case to a great conclusion.

  • Kathy Lindley
  • Google Review

I had a legal case that was difficult for me, and Russell Lorfing was very helpful throughout the process, advocating for me and working with me throughout the whole process. He was quite accessible as well whether by phone or email, and his staff was also quite helpful to reach out to. Russell was very systematic in going through the evidence that we had in building a case and gave pragmatic explanations on his views considering all the evidence. He also gave me the confidence several times during the process that the evidence for my case was sufficient in building a strong defense. I appreciate very much that he did not sugarcoat my situation and was patient in addressing concerns I had along the way. I strongly recommend Russell for anyone going through a difficult legal battle.

  • Michael Brown
  • Google Review

Russell was representing another client in federal court and my family saw him in action and we immediately fired our lawyer and hired Russell on the spot. One of the best decisions we’ve ever made. My brother’s case was very serious as he was looking at 40 years Fed for distribution of methamphetamine. Russell is very connected and well respected when it comes to law. He has great history in the courts with judges and prosecutors. Russell will not sell you a dream—he will shoot you straight and will not sugar coat anything. Russell was able to get my brother’s sentence cut in HALF to something way more reasonable.

  • Nick Mendez
  • Google Review

Russell Lorfing is THE guy you hire if you’ve been charged with a federal crime in West Texas. My fiancé was charged with a serious federal charge and we needed an experienced defense lawyer. He is one of the most honest lawyers you will find—he tells you exactly how things are and answers your questions honestly. He was looking at 13+ years, and now is looking at 5 years thanks to Mr. Lorfing, who did not rest until he was able to get him something better.

  • Verified Client
  • Google Review

My son is on State and Federal Parole. He was in a lot of trouble that could have landed him in prison for many years. Russell took my son’s case and has done a great job. Russell was able to get the state charges against my son dismissed—my son was looking at a minimum of twenty-five years. Russell also got my son a great plea deal with my son’s federal case. The Keith & Lorfing team treated us as if we were family. I recommend Keith & Lorfing to everybody.

  • Hazel Jefferson
  • Google Review

My entire experience with Keith and Lorfing has been great. I was facing the possibility of a 15 year MINIMUM sentence. Mr. Lorfing was very honest and made no promises but he reassured me that his main goal was to keep me out of prison. He did just that and I was able to sign for 6 years probation instead. I highly recommend Keith and Lorfing for anyone in need of a confident and experienced defense attorney.

  • Blanca Berumen
  • Google Review

My husband and I had a great experience working with Russell Lorfing. He managed to get my brother-in-law’s federal case dismissed in a short period of time. Mr. Lorfing is caring and is in constant contact with you and your family. He is a great federal defense lawyer. He is highly recommended!

  • Yoleny Palacios
  • Google Review

I wanted to express my deepest gratitude for the incredible support and expertise you provided to my family member. Your dedication and hard work made a world of difference during a challenging time. Thank you for going above and beyond to ensure the best possible outcome. We will strongly encourage anyone that is experiencing any case to consider Russell Lorfing Esq. to represent them.

  • Adrienne Holmes
  • Google Review

At the first of our situation we were scared and didn’t know where to begin. My wife made a phone call to Keith & Lorfing just to see where to begin—turned out to be the best decision! Russell and Chris from Keith & Lorfing were absolute professionals. They were the smartest and most prepared in the courtroom. Extremely impressed! They gave us our life back and could not thank them enough for what they did!

  • Aaron Wood
  • Google Review

I had the privilege of working with Keith and Lorfing for my criminal defense case, and I cannot recommend them highly enough. From the initial consultation to the courtroom proceedings, Keith and Lorfing demonstrated a deep understanding of the law and a commitment to protecting my rights. Thanks to their diligent efforts and sharp legal acumen, they successfully navigated the complexities of my case and ultimately secured a dismissal.

  • Adrien Strahan
  • Google Review

Russell was recommended to me by several people and we are so lucky to have found him! He was able to get a potential 7 year sentence down to only 9 months. Not to mention he and everyone at the law firm was so kind and helpful. It felt more like a family than a law firm. Would recommend to anyone who is in a tough spot.

  • Georgia Fuller
  • Google Review

A referral that I am very glad I was given. Not only did he meet the expectations I had heard from the referral, but exceeded them beyond measure. The process was simple and I was very comfortable and confident throughout. Mr. Lorfing and his associates are amazing and helpful. 10/10 recommended for their honesty and assistance.

  • Matthew Godinez
  • Google Review

Absolutely the best lawyer and staff I’ve ever met. He was more concerned with telling me the facts of where I stood legally than taking my case just for his financial gain. If I ever need any more legal help, I will go to their firm.

  • Kris Knight
  • Google Review

I am truly thankful for all you have done for me and my case. My family and I greatly appreciate everything you have done. I am greatly and truly impressed with the outcome. You were great at getting the answers for any question I had and explaining what everything meant. You are very outstanding and have done an amazing job. Thank you so much Russell!

  • Amy Rodriguez
  • Google Review

Russell did an amazing job. My case truly was a hail Mary. Lots of threading the needle and moving parts was an understatement. It’s a true testament that if someone wants to really change and will help him help themselves, he can and will.

  • Andy Dunlap
  • Google Review

Russell was an incredible advocate for my family. He regularly communicated with us and made us feel like we were his priority. My brother was looking at a mandatory minimum ten years in federal prison with a maximum possible sentence of life. He ended up pleading to a much less serious crime and serving less than a year. If you’ve been charged with a federal crime in West Texas, Russell Lorfing is THE ATTORNEY you hire.

  • Willie Kershaw
  • Google Review

After I was initially charged, I was swimming in a pool of despair. After my initial intake appointment there was a welcoming presence and a pedigree of honesty with my circumstances. Nothing was sugarcoated but they never made me feel like what I wanted was out of question. I couldn’t be more thrilled about the outcome—Keith literally reached into the depths of the justice system and pulled me out untarnished.

  • Williwill777
  • Google Review

Thank you Mr. Lorfing for your work getting my family member’s Federal MTR Dismissed. We know the time crunch made communication difficult so a special shout out to his legal assistant Wendi as well for getting back with me and reassuring our family things were getting done behind the scenes. We couldn’t have asked for a better outcome.

  • Brooklyn Martinez
  • Google Review

Mr. Lorfing is AMAZING! He is truly a miracle worker! My brother got into deep trouble, so we contacted the best lawyer to represent him. While most lawyers bring up payment options first, he listened to our story first. Mr. Lorfing resolved it before it got way worse and treated us like family. The Lorfing Law Firm is the way to go. He saved my brother and saved my family from heartaches.

  • MJ D
  • Google Review

Mr. Lorfing is different. He really cares about justice being served. He did a wonderful job with my son as his client. Mr. Lorfing doesn’t accept the usual outcomes of a case. He delves into all possibilities and outcomes for his clients and puts forth great effort when representing his clients. He is a very good lawyer.

  • Tammy Foster
  • Google Review

I had a complicated case and this man really did his job—and did it in no time. I’m so happy with his professionalism and empathy towards me. He really had my back. Thank you Mr. Lorfing.

  • Amy Kilough
  • Google Review

Confidential Consultation

Facing Federal Scrutiny? Act Early.

Early strategic intervention can significantly impact the course of a federal investigation. Contact our investigations team for a confidential consultation.